ifo Institute
Munich
2021
What Is the Substance-Based Carve-Out under Pillar 2? And How Will It Affect Tax Competition?
Michael P. Devereux, Martin Simmler, John Vella, Heydon Wardell-Burrus
Key messages:
The success of the recently agreed international tax reform hinges on a technical issue in the design of the Pillar 2 global minimum tax
Pillar 2 ensures the minimum taxation of ‘residual’ (e.g. non-routine) profts at 15%. ‘Routine’ proft is not subject to Pillar 2.
The effects depend on which of two possible options is used:
- Option 1 removes the incentive to compete below a liability of 15% of residual profts and puts a floor to tax competition
- Option 2 still maintains an incentive for governments to compete by reducing their taxes – possibly all the way to zero.
Consequences for tax competition depend on the technical details to be revealed.
Announcement containing more details of the proposal are expected shortly.