Tax Experts: Tax Rented German Real Estate Fairly Instead of Expropriating It
ifo President Clemens Fuest, Johanna Hey (University of Cologne), and Christoph Spengel (University of Mannheim) have advocated not expropriating rented properties in Germany but instead abolishing their tax privileges. “Instead of populist calls for expropriation, policymakers would do better to consider abolishing tax privileges for real estate in income, trade, inheritance, and real estate transfer taxes,” they write in an article for ifo Schnelldienst. They point out that such privileges lead to disincentives for investors and an unfair distribution of the tax burden. The tax rules favor the accumulation of real assets in the hands of a few people and companies, and the tax code is a factor in high real estate prices.
Comparatively small corrections in income tax, trade tax, inheritance tax, and real estate transfer tax could remedy these problems and increase tax revenue without burdening economic development. “Legislators could think about taxing capital gains for income tax purposes beyond the current ten-year period, abolishing the trade tax exemption for real estate corporations, and reforming the real estate transfer tax,” Hey says. Moreover, this would generate additional tax revenue in line with the system.
“In the case of rented real estate, the double benefit of unlimited deduction of income-related expenses and tax exemption of capital gains is one of the last remaining major tax incentives under Germany’s income tax law. Capital gains ought to be fully taxed,” Spengel says.
Furthermore, the authors write that the profits of real estate companies are not subject to trade tax if they are attributable exclusively to the administration and management of the company’s own real estate, including profits from its sale. A real estate corporation can collect its rental income and profits from the sale of real estate without paying trade tax, so only the corporation tax of 15 percent is due.
According to the authors, the inheritance tax favors large housing portfolios if their management requires a commercial business operation, with the tax authorities assuming that this is the case for portfolios of 300 apartments or more. There is absolutely no justification for this privilege. “The tax authorities’ approach in practice is conspicuously contrary to the principle of equality, because only particularly large portfolios can enjoy this incentive,” the authors write.
Fuest, Hey, and Spengel also criticize the fact that real estate companies often buy and sell properties free of real estate transfer tax. Avoiding this tax is legal if buyers do not purchase real estate directly, but instead buy shares in corporations that own the real estate.
Publication
How to Design Electricity Markets in the Age of Fluctuating Renewable Energy?
ifo Institut, München, 2021
ifo Schnelldienst, 2021, 74, Nr. 12, 57-63
Proposals for a Reform of Real Estate Taxation
ifo Institut, München, 2021
ifo Schnelldienst, 2021, 74, Nr. 12, 31-38
The ifo Earnings Assessments and the Return on Sales in Manufacturing
ifo Institut, München, 2021
ifo Schnelldienst, 2021, 74, Nr. 12, 73-76
Restart after Covid-19: A Comparison of Crisis Stimulus
ifo Institut, München, 2021
ifo Schnelldienst, 2021, 74, Nr. 12, 03-30
Steering the Energy Transition through Optimal Subsidies and Taxes for Fluctuating Renewable Energy and Storage Facilities
ifo Institut, München, 2021
ifo Schnelldienst, 2021, 74, Nr. 12, 64-68
Europe’s Schools in the Coronavirus Pandemic – A Country Comparison
ifo Institut, München, 2021
ifo Schnelldienst, 2021, 74, Nr. 12, 01-12
Individualism – Driving Cultural Force for Skills and Labor Market Success
ifo Institut, München, 2021
ifo Schnelldienst, 2021, 74, Nr. 12, 51-56
Macroeconomic Recovery Generates Unexpected Additional Tax Revenue: On the Results of the 161st Tax Estimate of November 2021
ifo Institut, München, 2021
ifo Schnelldienst, 2021, 74, Nr. 12, 69-72
Promoting Investment through Accelerated Tax Depreciation
ifo Institut, München, 2021
ifo Schnelldienst, 2021, 74, Nr. 12, 39-40