Coronavirus

The coronavirus crisis began in China in late 2019 and has caused major health and economic damage worldwide. In the affected countries, it triggered both a supply shock and a demand shock, thus giving rise to the essential difficulty in the economic management of the coronavirus.

Hat Auswirkungen auf die Wirtschaft: Das Coronavirus
Hat Auswirkungen auf die Wirtschaft: Das Coronavirus

No-Covid – Consistently Reducing the Number of Infections

In the No-Covid strategy co-developed by the ifo Institute, the aim is to get through the pandemic with the lowest possible health and economic costs and consequential damage. The means of doing so is a concept that consistently reduces infection figures and offers regionally differentiated, sustainable options for reopening the economy. Stop-gap measures must be replaced by a long-term and binding overall plan.

Supplementing vaccination measures, hygiene rules, and other means of infection control, the No-Covid strategy is based on four interlocking elements: Green Zones, early detection, acceleration of test-trace-isolate (TTI) , and local outbreak management. Applying this strategy can achieve low incidence rates, which in turn would enable a comprehensive and sustainable easing of restrictions in all sectors of society, while avoiding a resurgence in infection rates and, by extension, further lockdowns.

The idea that the goals of public health and the economy are in conflict is false. Studies show that measures to quickly manage and contain the pandemic do not come at the expense of economic development, but can actually serve the recovery of the economy. Research from the US and Scandinavia shows that only a smaller proportion of the decline in consumption and job losses in the spring of 2020 can be attributed to the lockdown measures during the first wave of the coronavirus. Most of the economic decline can be explained by the high level of local infection; in other words, consumption would drop significantly even without closure orders, in some cases with a time lag.

Studies by the Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research (HZI) and the ifo Institute show that, by renewing the lockdown measures in October and November 2020, Germany did not succeed in reducing the reproductive number (Rt) to below 1. Instead, the extension caused many deaths and inflicted the greatest economic damage. It is more economically beneficial in the medium term to use effective infection control measures and to temporarily curtail economic activity to bring infections down to an incidence rate that allows the public health service to exercise full local control, conduct contact tracing, and contain infections. The measures of a lockdown and opening strategy should be chosen so that Rt is in the range of 0.7–0.8. The stability of an infection situation in which some restrictions have been relaxed also plays an important role in a containment strategy that is best for the economy. If a resurgence of infections is highly probable, this leads to significant economic disadvantages due to the high degree of uncertainty, and unfortunately could bring about a renewed impairment of economic activity (even without government-imposed closures).

Germany as an Open Economy Particularly Affected

Taken together, the United States, China, Japan, Germany, the United Kingdom, France, and Italy represent 60 percent of global economic activity (gross domestic product), 65 percent of global industrial production, and 41 percent of global exports of goods. Germany in particular is being affected by current developments. As an open economy that is tightly integrated into global value chains, it is more vulnerable than other countries to the economic effects of the coronavirus.

Comparison with the 2009 Financial Crisis

The corona crisis is an economic shock whose magnitude dwarfs all the crises the world economy has experienced since the Second World War. A comparison with the financial crisis shows that the corona crisis involves more countries, including China, and that the course of events to date has been different.

Germany: Decline in Annual GDP Growth Rate
Rate of Change in Real Gross Domestic Product in 2009 and 2020
United Kingdom: Decline in Annual GDP Growth Rate
Italy: Decline in Annual GDP Growth Rate
France: Decline in Annual GDP Growth Rate
Infographic, ifo Business Climate Germany, December 2022
Infographic, ifo Business Climate Germany, December 2022
Infographic, ifo Business climate seasonally adjusted, December 2022
Infographic, ifo Business climate seasonally adjusted, December 2022
Infographic, ifo Business climate, seasonally adjusted,  December2022
Infographic, ifo Business climate, seasonally adjusted, December2022
Infographic, ifo assessment of business situation, seasonally adjusted, december 2022
Infographic, ifo assessment of business situation, seasonally adjusted, december 2022
Infographic, ifo Business Cycle Clock Germany, December 2022
Infographic, ifo Business Cycle Clock Germany, December 2022
Infographic, real gross domestic product in germany march 2021
Infographic, Unemployment rates, April 2021
Infographic, growth in gross domestic product, April 2021
Infographic, state budget, budget balances, April 2021
Infographic, public debt before the crisis, April 2021

Short-Time Work during the Coronavirus Crisis

During the coronavirus crisis, more companies than ever before have introduced short-time work for their employees. In the first few weeks of the pandemic, the number of short-time workers surpassed its previous peak of spring 2009, when almost 1.5 million people were on short-time work. In contrast to 2009, the current crisis is also affecting service sector companies. The period for which employees can receive the short-time allowance is also longer than in previous crises. Official statistics on short-time work are available only with a considerable time lag. For this reason, the ifo Institute developed a timely estimate based on the monthly ifo Business Survey, which is available at the end of each month. In the public perception, this new estimate has already become a trusted indicator of the crisis’s impact on the labor market.

Short-time work by sectors (In German)

Infographic, short-time work in 2022-2023
Infographic, ifo estimates of short-time work, Januar 2023
Infographic, ifo estimates of short-time work in manufacturing, January 2023
Infographic, registrations for short-time work in Germany, November 2022
Video

ifo Podcast: Home Office in Times of Pandemic

Millions of employees have been working from home for more than a year. Digitization has received an enormous boost in this way. However, the potential is far from exhausted. In January 2021, the German government introduced a home office obligation for companies in order to combat the spread of the Coronavirus. Will the home office become the new normal even beyond the pandemic?

Video

ifo Podcast: Education on Lockdown – The Corona Record of Schools

Covid-19 has made deficits in schools clearly visible: Too less digital equipment, too less digital competence, and too less flexibility in terms of how learning content is taught. How did schoolchildren cope during the pandemic? Did homeschooling work during the lockdown?

Video

ifo Podcast: Public Finances after Corona

After many years without new debt, the Corona crisis has caused debt levels to rise sharply again. This new debt and rising consumer prices are fueling concerns about growing inflation. Are these concerns justified? How can the national debt be brought back to a reasonable level? Are tax increases necessary?

Video

ifo Podcast: How Global Supply Chains Can Become More Resilient?

Global supply chains consist of production sites distributed around the world. Is this complex set-up an additional risk in times of crisis? What must policymakers and companies do to make international supply chains more crisis-proof in the future?

Video

Press conference: The Impact of School Closures in Early 2021

Contact
Prof. Dr. Timo Wollmershäuser, Stellvertretender Leiter des ifo Zentrums für Makroökonomik und Befragungen

Prof. Dr. Timo Wollmershäuser

Deputy Director of the ifo Center for Macroeconomics and Surveys and Head of Forecasts
Tel
+49(0)89/9224-1406
Fax
+49(0)89/907795-1406
Mail
Dr. Klaus Wohlrabe

Dr. Klaus Wohlrabe

Deputy Director of the ifo Center for Macroeconomics and Surveys and Head of Surveys
Tel
+49(0)89/9224-1229
Fax
+49(0)89/9224-1463
Mail